The Loch Ness Monster is a
prehistoric creature thought to inhabit the Loch Ness in the Scottish
Highlands. As lake monsters go, Scotland has tales of a fair few, with Nessie
gaining the most popularity of all on the back of anecdotal evidence.
Nessie first hit the headlines
in 1933 when a story was published in the Inverness Courier. The report quoted
a Londoner who had visited a few weeks earlier as seeing: "a most
extraordinary form of animal... the nearest approach to a dragon or
pre-historic animal that I have ever seen in my life."
After that, more sightings were
reported and this unexplained phenomena hit international headlines. That same
year, one motorcyclist claimed to nearly hit Nessie late one night as it
lumbered across the road and slid back into the loch. Soon, apparent photos of
the Loch Ness Monster were published.
In 1960, an aeronautical
engineer filmed a hump crossing the water in Loch Ness in a powerful wake
unlike that of a boat.
Years later, digital
enhancement of the footage revealed what seemed to be the rear body, flippers,
and two more humps of a plesiosaur-like body. The technician said: "Before
I saw the film, I thought the Loch Ness Monster was a load of rubbish. Having
done the enhancement, I'm not so sure."
There's no doubt that the story
of Nessie has drawn huge tourist interest to the famed Loch Ness. But should it
be considered one of the genuine unexplained mysteries of the world? While some
people believe the monster is a living plesiosaur, New Scientist points out
that such a creature could not physically lift its head up out of the water
like the photos and anecdotes suggest.
The most compelling evidence of
its non-existence is that the loch is a mere 10,000 years old - and was frozen
solid for about 20,000 years before that. For a prehistoric monster claimed to
be millions of years old, the numbers just don't add up.
Related Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment